tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2553903000955128175.post2058322185617103536..comments2024-03-28T10:57:16.064-04:00Comments on OHL Prospects: Preliminary Media/Scout Poll for 2016Brock Ottenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08237782074032840702noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2553903000955128175.post-7871921104668557062015-12-04T01:09:04.973-05:002015-12-04T01:09:04.973-05:002 words .....Matt Luff2 words .....Matt LuffAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2553903000955128175.post-9269162710622468162015-11-14T15:13:24.808-05:002015-11-14T15:13:24.808-05:00I see Logan Stanley make a leap into the top round...I see Logan Stanley make a leap into the top round on Button's list and having watched the Spitfires lately he is looking like he deserves that sort of consideration. Why do none of you give him the credit that Button does? When I watch him play he looks as good as these London defencemen you're slobbering all over. Seriously, Mete is a better draft prospect than Stanley? When you guys keep whiffing on things like this, inflating the placement of average prospects because of the knight logo on their chest, it does nothing for your credibility as a scout. Anybody can scan the roster of the knights for draft age players and pretend to be a draft expert by talking them up. It's like picking all the Red Wings draft picks as your sleepers of the draft, is it because you've seen the players perform to that level or is it because you're conditioned to believe every draft pick by the team must be a gem? It would serve you well to take off the Knight shaded glasses, they have some good prospects but some of these later guys from that team aren't the superstars you make them out to be. The two guys at the top from London belong there but the rest are enjoying the ride in my opinion. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com