Thursday, June 26, 2025

2025 NHL Draft Primer

It's NHL Draft Day! The 2025 Draft is here. As is the usual, I'll be bringing you coverage on social media.

However, if you're looking for information on the OHL players available (ahead of time), look no further than my draft primer.


My Final Top 50 Ranking:




Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Final Media Top 10 for 2025

The 2025 NHL Draft takes place this week and that means it’s time to update the media/scout poll!

For those unfamiliar with how this works, I poll many of the OHL's brightest minds; those who cover the league incredibly well and know the OHL inside, and out. These contributors supply me with their top 10 available players from the OHL, in addition to some comments. I then put it all together and provide you with a cumulative list. Call it "the consensus."

For comparison's sake, here was the preliminary list (from mid February):


This is definitely a strong crop from Ontario. The league could and should have the top two selections. They could have five of the top eight. And they could have upwards of ten first round selections. 

Not a ton of changes from the preliminary list. Simon Wang went from getting three votes to zero. Henry Brzustewicz moves into the top ten. Other players received top ten consideration.

As always, this list involves contributions from a rather colourful cast of characters. Contributing their rankings and thoughts to this preliminary list for 2025 were:

Corey Pronman - NHL Prospects Writer for TheAthletic (@coreypronman)

Dominic Tiano - Writer for The OHL Writers (@dominictiano)

Ryan Kennedy - Editor in Chief for The Hockey News (@THNRyanKennedy)

Steven Ellis - Prospect Analyst for Daily Faceoff (@SEllisHockey)

Scott Wheeler - NHL Prospects Writer for TheAthletic (@scottcwheeler)

Peter Baracchini - Draft Content at The Hockey Writers (@PBaracchini)

Tony Ferrari – NHL Draft Content for The Hockey News (@theTonyFerrari)

Kaeden Ireland - Video Scout at McKeen’s Hockey (@Kaeden25075788)

Kyle Watson - Content Creator at McKeen's Hockey (@kyle_nw)

and of course...myself (@BrockOtten)


Here's the List:

1. Matthew Schaefer - Defense - Erie Otters
Highest Ranking: 1st (9x)
Lowest Ranking: 2nd (1x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments: 
“To those that are concerned about a lack of sample size, I would say it's near certain his stock would only be higher had he played more. I think it actually underscores how exceptional of a defensive prospect he is, especially given how impressive Michael Misa has been as a challenger. Schaefer was just beginning to figure out how dominant he can be at the junior level. The confidence he has carried himself with since he was the top player at the Hlinka-Gretzky Cup only continues to build. He keeps on adding layers to a solid base of elite mobility and an exceptional read of the game. Right now, I don't think there’s a defenceman—in junior, college, or the NHL—with a better chance of becoming a true No. 1 franchise cornerstone.” - Kyle Watson

“His skill set speaks for itself—elite offensive instincts, outstanding defensive play, smooth zone breakouts, the ability to drive play from end to end, shot-blocking, physical engagement, exceptional hockey IQ, and dominance in puck battles. However, two qualities often overlooked are his relentless competitiveness and unwavering consistency. Every shift, he brings the same level of intensity, never letting his effort dip. When you combine that drive with his remarkable skill set, it's clear that Schaefer has all the makings of a franchise defenseman.” - Dominic Tiano

“What if you're getting the next Cale Makar here? Schaefer has size, skating and skill in all areas of the game, plus a ton of character. He's a perfect kid to build a franchise around.” - Ryan Kennedy

“Everything in his game is built out from his feet. The mobility allows him to impact the game at both ends of the ice and truly bring a special element in transition. Scheafer has shown to be a play-driving blueliner with the puck on his stick. His dynamic skill as a playmaker makes him special. As I said with Misa, it’s a 1A/B situation in my eyes.” - Tony Ferrari

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that Matthew Schaefer is the top prospect coming out of the OHL and will be selected first at the 2025 NHL Draft. He tested well during the Draft Combine and his personality and character shined in media scrums, showing those leadership qualities on and off the ice. He only played 17 games this season, but he made it count after dealing with illness and a broken collarbone. In that short span, he showed the IQ, composure, drive and a high-end work ethic on both sides of the puck. At such a young age, to have that skill and mindset, he has all the tools to be a number one two-way, mobile defender.” - Peter Baracchini

“It’s impossible to find an element in Schaefer’s game that isn’t best in this class. There isn’t a better, more deceptive skater on the blueline available, with his mobility being among the best we’ve seen in recent draft classes. Schaefer is as good of a puck distributor as you’ll find, too, and it’s only a matter of time until he pops off in the NHL. That’s partly because he thinks game at such an advanced level for his age, often luring opponents in before pulling off a deceptive deke and getting the puck where it needs to be. Scouts note just how high his hockey IQ is. You can have all the skill in the world, or you could be the biggest, meanest defender around, but if you can’t make quick decisions and your skating lags behind, you’re screwed.” - Steven Ellis

“The most common question that I’m asked on podcast/radio hits is something centered around the small sample size this year and why Schaefer still managed to rise to the top of the draft. Look, I get it. It’s almost unprecedented. However, when he played, Schaefer was hands down the best player on the ice every game; a true difference maker. Then you add in other elements like his outstanding work ethic, resiliency, leadership qualities, and the fact that he’s one of the youngest players available this year, and you get a better picture. I’ve never been so sure of a prospect hitting the upper echelons of their upside. Think Duncan Keith, Drew Doughty, heck, maybe even Scott Niedermayer. I’m all in on Schaefer.” - Brock Otten

2. Michael Misa - Center - Saginaw Spirit
Highest Ranking: 1st (1x)
Lowest Ranking: 2nd (9x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments: 
“Michael Misa should be a lock at second overall. He’s a natural-born goal scorer who thrives in the middle of the ice with a commanding presence in the offensive zone. Finding a better finisher in 1-on-1 situations with goaltenders in this class would be challenging. It’s unlikely he is a traditional playdriver in the pros, as his play style leans more towards connecting plays and finishing chances. Should Misa be selected second by San Jose, he’ll be the second half of a lethal 1-2 punch at center alongside Celebrini.” - Kaeden Ireland

“His exceptional hockey IQ allows him to read the game faster than anyone else on the ice. He has the ability to control the tempo, slowing things down when needed to create openings for his teammates and capitalize on scoring opportunities. No matter the situation, he logs significant minutes, proving his reliability and endurance. Defensively, his intelligence shines as he conserves energy strategically, ensuring he’s always ready to transition to the attack. A dynamic skater, he not only drives play but also finds the back of the net, making him far more than just a playmaker—he’s a true offensive threat.” - Dominic Tiano

“Misa isn’t just the second-best prospect in the OHL, he’s the second-best prospect in this class. He was in rarified air this year as a rare 60-goal man and 130-point man and he did it as a centerman who plays the game with equal parts speed and skill as he does commitment.” - Anonymous

“The numbers were incredible and he got my vote for the Red Tilson Award. Competitive to go along with his great skill, Misa also improved his 200-foot-game this season.” - Ryan Kennedy

“A complete, all-around center who scored at a better rate than almost anyone in OHL history among draft eligibles. Misa is an intelligent and tactical player that has a diverse goal scoring arsenal. It’s 1A/B with Scheafer but Misa gets the edge for me because of just how consistently he put together outstanding efforts, even if it came in an understated way at times.” - Tony Ferrari

“The CHL’s Top Scorer really made his mark this season, decimating the competition with 62 goals and 134 points. His high-end skillset, shot and playmaking makes him a lethal offensive threat as he’s always driving and creating opportunities for himself and his teammates. He’s extremely deceptive as he opens up lanes very well for him to attack and put the puck in a good spot for a play to continue. He shows great off the puck awareness and anticipation in order to transition quickly and have opponents on their heels on what he’s going to do next. He has great attention to detail and continues to elevate his game.” - Peter Baracchini

“Misa is the top forward in the draft, one who could potentially go first overall. Misa is an outstanding skater who’ll beat you both in short bursts and with his pure straight-line speed. He’s as good a play-driver as you’ll find from any forward in this class. His hockey sense is truly elite, too. Heck, he’s even got some muscle in his 6-foot-1 frame. Misa isn’t a bruiser by any means, but he’s more than willing to get physical. Misa uses all his traits to exploit defenders and generate scoring chances. His shot is deceptive, rarely needing much of a wind-up to get it where he wants it.” - Steven Ellis

“What’s not mentioned enough regarding Misa is that he has a solid frame and some bite to his game, to go with all his skill. I suspect that as he fills out, he’s going to become a fairly physical and tenacious NHL player. Misa just doesn’t really have a weakness. About as complete as they come. The only thing that I’d say is that I’m not completely convinced that he’s a center long term. Doesn’t matter to me. He’s going to be versatile nonetheless.” - Brock Otten

3. Porter Martone - Wing - Brampton Steelheads
Highest Ranking: 3rd (8x)
Lowest Ranking: 4th (2x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments: 
“Porter Martone is a very concerning prospect for me. He hasn’t shown too much drive or physical abilities during his draft year, as his mean streak has shown up almost exclusively after play. Martone isn’t too fast, but his skills are undeniable, and his shot is above average.
The biggest question remains: does his pace of play improve, or does he become a more physical player? Without improving one of these two areas, it’ll be difficult for Martone to become a top-six winger.” - Kaeden Ireland

“Martone brings a physical edge to his game: the classic NHL power forward. His strong frame and aggressive north-south play make him fearless when driving through defenders. He thrives along the boards and behind the goal line, one of the most dominant in this draft class. However, his game isn’t just about power—he also possesses a level of finesse, capable of making plays. He excels in battling for position in front of the net, embracing the gritty areas where goals are earned, and has the ability to score from multiple spots in the offensive zone. While consistency was a challenge at times this season, maintaining his intense, physical style of play is a demanding task.” - Dominic Tiano

“I've always been a fan, but no one can deny that it was impressive Martone was named to Canada's World Championship team in the spring, where he got to play on the same team as Sidney Crosby and Nathan MacKinnon. He's the heavy power forward everyone covets.” - Ryan Kennedy

“There are plenty of styles that can be used to describe Martone; agitator, power forward, playmaker, net front presence and the list goes on. He’s a number of players built into one and he excels at it every time he’s on the ice. He can cut through defenders and maintain great control in tight spaces and is always driving hard to the middle of the ice to be a threat. He’s tough to contain in front of the net and is always pouncing on a loose puck and taking advantage of it. He’s always getting lost in coverage and then sneaks in to make a high-end scoring chance. He does a great job to draw defenders in to get them out of position and open lanes up very well to make life easier for everyone around him.” - Peter Baracchini

“In terms of pure offense, there aren’t many that play like Martone. He has arguably the best vision in the entire draft class and has some of the best offensive IQ, too. While his skating might be lacking and some scouts wish he’d be more physical, everyone agrees that he’s one of the smartest players in this draft class. He just understands the game and how to exploit opportunities.” - Steven Ellis

“I think Martone has been miscast a bit; call it wishful thinking maybe. I don’t think he has the jam in his game to be a Matthew Tkachuk type. He’s just not consistently physical or tenacious enough to be that kind of player. I’m of the belief that you either have that naturally as part of your personality or you don’t (like a Brady Martin). It’s something that is tough to develop. That said, you’d be hard pressed to find a better complementary top six winger this year. Intelligent. Skilled. Outstanding scoring chops. Size to boot, even if he could leverage that more. This is a long time 60+ point player in the NHL.” - Brock Otten

4. Jake O’Brien - Center - Brantford Bulldogs
Highest Ranking: 3rd (1x)
Lowest Ranking: 6th (1x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments:
“I think the hype around O'Brien is getting out of hand, and I say that as someone who is a big fan of his. There is no denying his talent, the point totals and his ability to manipulate defenders at a standstill and pick out passing lanes. However, a lack of even-strength production and goals, to me, highlight his struggles driving up the middle of the ice. I am still high on him and view him as a lottery pick. I just think there are a lot of questions regarding his projection. Yes, he can add weight onto a wiry build, but that's not a guarantee he will be a physically adept NHL player. I'm really interested to see how he fares without a goalscorer as exceptional as Nick Lardis, and if he can become more of a play driver and less of a really, really strong complimentary player. He was underwhelming for me in international play outside of the Bulldogs' system, as well as during this year's playoffs, when Lardis was hurt.” - Kyle Watson

“Jake O’Brien has seen his stock rise significantly down the stretch, and for good reason. He is extremely well-rounded with a strong motor, incredible intelligence, and some nifty hands. O’Brien is far from a sure thing, as there are major concerns with his reliance on the added space powerplays brought and his lengthy on-puck possessions, which will be difficult to bring to the NHL, where defenders are stronger and more competent. O’Brien’s shot is also a major concern for me. His goal totals are inflated by his linemates, and he will be a pure playmaker at the next level. I believe in O’Brien to overcome these challenges due to his quick processing and ability to get off passes that many NHLers struggle with.” - Kaeden Ireland

“Big, smart center could easily be a top-10 pick overall. Creative and elusive, some scouts have compared him to Wyatt Johnston.” - Ryan Kennedy

“The enticing package that O’Brien brings is built on just how supremely high-end his vision and passing are combined with the fact that his physical package is still quite raw. Teams envision him growing another inch and filling out his frame to become everything you’d want in a play-driving center. O’Brien is one of the more interesting playmakers in the draft.” - Tony Ferrari

“O’Brien has the skills and the smarts to be a very impressive center in the NHL. His off-puck play is great, and he’s always out-thinking his opponents. O’Brien just fell short of 100 points with 98, but he only continued to get better as the season wore on. He’s never going to blow you away with his pure skill, but his work ethic and ability to be effective in all three zones will allow him to have a solid career.” - Steven Ellis

“Starting to feel like I’m the only person in the scouting community with questions about O’Brien’s projection. If he’s the next Patrice Bergeron, I’m going to look pretty foolish. It’s not that I don’t like O’Brien either. I do believe that he is one of the smartest players in the draft this year. I just have a hard time looking past the difficulties at even strength. Pace and strength on the puck need to improve greatly. Maybe added weight helps him make those adjustments across the board, but maybe that just doesn’t happen. I just prefer a guy like Brady Martin, or some of the others ranked in that 6-12 range.” - Brock Otten 

5. Brady Martin - Center - Soo Greyhounds
Highest Ranking: 3rd (1x)
Lowest Ranking: 5th (7x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments:
“It's no surprise as the season progressed and the games got more important, Martin began to shoot up draft boards. It mirrors his OHL Draft year, where an emphatic OHL Cup performance thrust him into the first-overall conversation with Matthew Schaefer and Ryan Roobroeck.
If he becomes the Beckett Sennecke of this year's draft and gets selected in the top-5, it's because there's a team that sees beyond the crash-and-bash playing style that has become Martin's calling card. There is real top-six upside here: I can see him scoring at a 50-goal, 120-point pace in the OHL next season. I think his shot and puck skills are underrated, and his skating—while not a strength—has steadily improved in junior.” - Kyle Watson

“Brady Martin has been likened to Sam Bennett by many, and following this year’s playoff dominance by the latter, Martin’s stock has skyrocketed. Any NHL general managers in danger of losing their jobs can look to Martin as a safe bet to crack an NHL middle six and bring 100% of his intensity on every single shift. Brady also possesses some intriguing playmaking abilities with quick changes in direction, creativity, and swift hands. The top-six upside is there, but the consistent offensive IQ hasn’t been there through all viewings.” - Kaeden Ireland

“He could very well be the premier power forward of this draft class, bringing a relentless presence to the ice. His aggressive forechecking consistently forces turnovers, and he never hesitates to deliver a hard hit. A powerful skater with good acceleration, he maintains exceptional balance, making it difficult for opponents to knock him off the puck. His ability to drive the net—with or without the puck—is a key strength. Another underrated aspect of his game is his proficiency in zone entries, an area where he consistently excels. Additionally, he’s highly effective in the faceoff circle. His competitive edge and tireless work ethic make him a player who refuses to be outworked. Since the Under-18 tournament, his stock has been rising steadily, and his full body of work speaks for itself.” - Dominic Tiano

“A secret no longer, Martin's performance at the world under-18s has everyone on the bandwagon. Scouts love his combination of physicality, skill and tenacity. Another playoff-style prospect.” - Ryan Kennedy

“There has been considerable discussion recently surrounding Martin. Here’s what I’ll say: this is a guy you win with. He’s built for the playoffs like Brad Marchand, so undervalue him at your own peril. Martin played at more than a point per game this season, doing a lot of heavy lifting for the Soo. Away from the puck, He hits everyone in sight, constantly battles hard for the puck and is a noted goal-scorer, too. He doesn’t always have top-level players to play with on the Greyhounds, but he does look like one of the best players to come out of the OHL this year because he does so much all over the ice and never gives up on a play.” - Steven Ellis

“I feel like I’ve been championing Martin most of the season and I’m glad the rest of the scouting community has finally caught on. Look at the history of the draft. The amateur scouting community has consistently undervalued or underestimated the offensive upside of players like Martin over the years. When you play a certain way, there’s a tendency to label them as future third line players and nothing more. But, what people seem to fail to realize quite often is that the way goals are scored in the NHL, the way offense is generated, it’s the way Martin does it. I’m not saying he’s an Art Ross winner. But, I think he can be a consistent 50-60 point guy who plays in all situations, elevates his play in the postseason, and wears a letter. That’s worth a top ten pick all day.” - Brock Otten

6. Kashawn Aitcheson - Defense - Barrie Colts
Highest Ranking: 5th (1x)
Lowest Ranking: 8th (1x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments:
“Kashawn Aitcheson is tricky to project what he’ll be exactly at the next level. His strength and peskiness make him valuable defensively, and his shot is incredible, boasting elite power. Unlike Reid, Kashawn’s rush game is very linear; he carries in a straight line, often opting to pass off or dump the puck in when he encounters resistance. He does enough to bring something to the table in all three zones, but his decision-making, while improving, is still a concern for me. He often drifts a bit too much from his netfront, allowing attackers to farm easy chances when he’s in man-on-man coverage. Kashawn’s tools will likely make him a bottom-four defenseman who can play triggerman on the powerplay.” - Kaeden Ireland

“Facing Aitcheson means stepping into a gritty, old-school hockey battle. He’s a fearless blueliner who thrives on physicality, delivering punishing hits that leave a lasting impact. His presence on the ice is as tough as they come, logging over 25 minutes of ice time per game while playing with an edge that keeps opponents on high alert. Beyond his physical game, he brings offensive capabilities as well. His quick hockey instincts allow him to react instantly, and his powerful, heavy shot is both accurate and dangerous. He’s more than willing to jump into the attack and push deep into the offensive zone, though refining his decision-making on when to press forward would elevate his effectiveness. His skating is solid, with good speed once he gets moving, but improving his backward stride would round out his overall mobility.” - Dominic Tiano

“He’s big, physical, mean, and he scored a boat load of goals this year, what’s not to like? That’s how NHL teams view Aitcheson but I’ve been less enthralled. His physicality largely comes from either chasing hits that take him out of position or after the whistle scrums. His on-puck game is a bit limited to having a big shot. He certainly has a role in the NHL but my question is just how high up the lineup?” - Tony Ferrari

“Aitcheson continues to be a fan favourite with his intense and heavy hitting style of play. He has no problem stepping up to make a big, open ice hit either along the boards or in the open ice. He definitely feels like a player that can sneak into the top-10 and even though his intensity will draw attention, he has a sound two-way game. He’s just as aggressive offensively to jump into the rush and engage in the offensive zone and unleash his powerful shot as he has come up clutch at many points down the stretch of the season. Defensively, he defends rushes very well and takes time and space away effectively and quickly.” - Peter Baracchini

“Aitcheson is one of my favorite prospects in the draft. He has the potential to be an intimidating force in the NHL – someone who just gives opponents nothing to work with. His physicality is the best attribute of his game because he’s willing to get involved with just about anyone. Aitcheson isn’t an outstanding skater, and his playmaking can be a bit of a mixed bag, but I think the raw talent and the pure tenacity are there for any teams looking to get tougher to play against.” - Steven Ellis

“I love Aitcheson. He’s a tone setter physically. He’s also a really intelligent off puck player in the offensive zone. He didn’t score so many goals this year just because of his big point shot. He’s highly intelligent, identifying opportunities to jump up in the play, sneak backdoor, or jump into the slot. I actually think he can produce offensively in the NHL. Kind of the same way a guy like Jake Muzzin did. What actually concerns me more is that Aitcheson does need to clean some things up defensively to be a true defensive stalwart, rather than just a high compete guy. How much his defensive zone awareness improves will be the main factor that decides whether he’s a top four defender, or more of a third pairing, depth type.” - Brock Otten 

7. Cameron Reid - Defense - Kitchener Rangers
Highest Ranking: 6th (1x)
Lowest Ranking: 8th (3x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments:
“Cameron Reid’s dominance carrying the puck is spectacular to watch. His hands rival those of the top forwards in this class, regularly making defenders look silly and taking the puck end-to-end. Reid’s defensive game was the largest point of concern for many, but his decision-making on the breakout has impressed me, and his positioning and compete started to improve during the later stages of the OHL season. He will need to be supported by a strong net-front defender, but Reid’s offensive potential and intelligence make him hard to pass up in the late teens.” - Kaeden Ireland

“As bluelines increasingly prioritize length, Reid’s a 6-footer who can cut through the norm as an excellent, well-rounded, impactful three-zone player who smarts, mobility and consistency will make him a longtime NHLer.” - Anonymous

“With a daring offensive mindset and a willingness to fully lean into it, Reid is the kind of player that you want to see make the NHL because he brings some really fun offensive elements to each of his games. His defensive zone is a bit of a work in progress to say the least but Reid is an enticing puck mover.” - Tony Ferrari

“Reid may have slightly dropped for me in rankings as his second half wasn’t as strong as his first, but I’m still high on him and one of my favourite defenders in this draft. He’s not going to dazzle with flashy moves on the back end, but he’s still extremely effective with his decision making, opting for the safe play and always comes out on top. He’s got great speed in transition and the ability to evade pressure within his own end for a clean breakout. He’s crisp and accurate with his passing, can get shots through on target and close gaps and defend rushes very well. He can do it all.” - Peter Baracchini

8. Malcolm Spence - Wing - Erie Otters
Highest Ranking: 6th (1x)
Lowest Ranking: 9th (3x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments:
“I'm excited to see how he fares at Michigan next season: I think it's a perfect fit stylistically and for his development. Spence does so much well but nothing truly high-end, and I feel he never really had someone to work with on the Otters. Every time he plays outside of Erie, whether it be at a showcase event or for Team Canada, you really see the level Spence can elevate his game to around more skilled players. Adding another 15-20 pounds and having more time to focus on his development will do wonders for the industrious winger. I can see him in an NHL lineup next year after the NCAA season comes to an end. All the pro habits are here.” - Kyle Watson

“A coach’s dream, Spence just seems to play the right way on every shift. He isn’t one for flashy plays or overwhelming his opponents with skill. He’d rather just make smart, simple plays to advance the puck to the offensive zone and then make something happen from there. He is physical at times, has some sneaky slick passing, and a good snapshot. Spence could be a very valuable middle-six forward for a long time.” - Tony Ferrari

“If there’s one thing that Spence doesn’t have, it’s an off-switch. He’s always in motion, constantly pressuring opponents to force mistakes and take advantage of them. His skating and agility are his greatest asset as he has a great burst of speed in transition, on the cycle and to spot the shooting lanes and attack the middle of the ice. He has great playmaking instincts and has the ability to rip the puck with his quick release. He protects the puck extremely well, leveraging his body on quick pivots and to evade pressure. He never panics and is always giving it his all each shift.” - Peter Baracchini

“I feel confident that Spence will be a good NHLer. Maybe not a top-six player, but someone whom you can assign a job to do and he’ll get it done. The Mississauga native isn’t flashy, but he’s a hard worker who loves hitting everyone he can and getting anyone off their game. Spence isn’t a high-end producer in the OHL, but he has been a point-per-gamer for most of the past two seasons. He’s very versatile, although not necessarily a top-six play-driver. I think he will be one heck of a middle-six player, at the very least.” - Steven Ellis

9. Jack Nesbitt - Center - Windsor Spitfires
Highest Ranking: 7th (2x)
Lowest Ranking: 10th (2x)
Total Votes: 10
Comments:
“Nesbitt is a versatile pivot who has added bulk to his frame this season but needs to continue building strength. His ability to adapt to any style of play makes him a valuable asset. A strong skater with solid agility and finesse, he excels offensively, capable of both scoring and setting up teammates with his smooth, precise puck control. Physicality is a key part of his game—he doesn’t shy away from contact and actively seeks out battles. When the game calls for a more defensive approach, he’s equally effective, showcasing his ability to play a low-scoring, structured style with discipline. His high compete level ensures he consistently supports his defensemen in his own zone while maintaining control in the middle of the ice. While his skating mechanics are strong, his overall speed is more average, but his skill set allows him to remain impactful in all areas of the ice.” - Dominic Tiano

“His game has grown so much since the start of last season. His skating, which was a major issue, has become workable and he’s evolved from being a spot-up shooter to a player who can actually involve himself in the play from cycles along the boards to working pucks into the slot as a passer. His shot remains a very good weapon but Nesbitt has become more than just his shot.” - Tony Ferrari

“Nesbitt is no doubt a raw prospect and has a lot of strength to build before he’s ready for the pros. On that note, he’s hovered around the same weight throughout his OHL tenure, meaning he’ll need to start making it a priority to bulk up over the upcoming offseason. If he can add muscle, he’ll gain a boost in his straight-line speed, stability, and puck battles, where he already displays impressive technique. Nesbitt is competent as a passenger in the offensive zone, but what really stands out is his shot with a blend of power and the ability to force goalies to make tough saves. Jack projects as a 3rd line center who can push the pace defensively and use his frame to disrupt the cycle.” - Kaeden Ireland

“I love that Nesbitt continues to compare himself to Adam Lowry in interviews. Coming into the year, the request was that he learned to play more to his size; his physical consistency needed to improve big time. He did that this year. He’s great on the forecheck. He seals the wall really well. He’s excellent in front of the net on tips and second chances. He’s not likely to ever be skilled, creative or quick enough to be a strong transitional attacker. But, his game is tailored perfectly to be the kind of guy who plays 12+ years in your bottom six, plays net front on your powerplay, and anchors your penalty kill.” - Brock Otten

10. Henry Brzustewicz - Defense - London Knights
Highest Ranking: 10th (5x)
Lowest Ranking: Outside of the Top Ten (5x)
Total Votes: 5
Comments:
“Primarily a stay-at-home defenseman with a physical edge, he excels at retrieving loose pucks and quickly transitioning play with sharp, accurate passes. While he has the ability to carry the puck out of the zone, he typically opts for the safer play to maintain stability. His aggressive approach to challenging the puck carrier at the blue line and in the neutral zone makes him highly effective in shutting down attacks. Positioning is the foundation of his game, and he consistently excels in that aspect. There is offensive potential in his skill set—he can navigate the blue line to create shooting lanes and deliver well-placed shots. Additionally, his passing is crisp and reliable, allowing him to maintain control at the offensive blue line. However, since he wasn’t utilized in a significant offensive role in London, it remains difficult to gauge the full extent of his offensive ceiling.” - Dominic Tiano

“Brzustewicz is an all-around defender who may not be the most refined right now, but he doesn’t have many notable flaws. He’s a two-way defender who can shoot the puck, skate well and is willing to join in on the rush any time he can. The more he played, the better he played, too. Brzustewicz feels like a safe pick to become a second-pairing defenseman, but I’d like to see him take further steps in his own-zone play.” - Steven Ellis

“I like Brzustewicz as a first round pick. He has some really projectable tools. Does he have a clear identity as a pro yet? I don’t really think so. But, that sort of blank canvas should be appealing. Good size. Skates well. Can get pucks to the middle of the ice. Has a big shot. Plays physical. Has a good stick in the defensive zone. It really comes down to whether you think Brzustewicz thinks the game at a high enough level to utilize these skills at the NHL level. Puck management needs to improve. D-zone awareness needs to improve. I just wonder what his game is going to look like in a few years after he’s quarterbacking the London powerplay full time and gains confidence in his offensive abilities. I don’t necessarily agree with him being a safer, lower upside pick. I kind of see him as the opposite. I think his upside has been masked this year given the role he’s been asked to play. And I think that if certain components of his game don’t get cleaned up, he’s probably not an NHL player.” - Brock Otten

Honorable Mentions

Jack Ivankovic - Goaltender - Brampton Steelheads
Highest Ranking: 10th (2x)
Total Votes: 2
Comments:
“Ivankovic is an incredibly smart and capable goaltender. The track record internationally speaks for itself but its his reads, anticipation, and competitiveness that will drive him to the NHL. One of the top goalies in this class despite his sub-6-foot listing.” - Anonymous

“The top goalie at the U18 Championship, Ivankovic really shined and proved that a goalie of his stature isn’t going to be a problem. Somehow, he always makes himself look bigger in the crease than he actually is, being aggressive and taking angles away. His quick lateral movements and athleticism really makes him unwavering in the crease. He tracks the puck extremely well, fighting through traffic and screens and is always squaring up with shooters to face them head on.” - Peter Baracchini

Alexei Medvedev - Goaltender - London Knights
Highest Ranking: 9th (1x)
Total Votes: 1
Comments:
“My placement of Medvedev may have more to do with how I view those I ranked below him than how highly I regard the Knights goaltender. Still, I think he will be one of the first netminders off the board this year and view him as the safer option over Ivankovic. I don't think he's as talented or athletic as Ivankovic, but he is much more composed and physically assertive in net. He cuts down angles, absorbs rebounds, and recovers well for the rebounds he does give up. Goalies who sit back in their crease, read the game well, and fight for their crease succeed behind good teams. Medvedev has shown that ability behind a powerhouse London Knights group this year. It's not easy to find consistency as a goaltender when you're facing a lot of breaks and chances cold (because the Knights have the puck for minutes on end). I thought the Russian was composed beyond his years at the start of the season, and I don't think he faltered, but rather came back to Earth ahead of the playoffs. He will have every chance to succeed next season as the out-and-out starter.” - Kyle Watson

Filip Ekberg - Wing - Ottawa 67’s
Highest Ranking: 9th (1x)
Total Votes: 1
Comments:
“After a poor first half, Ekberg’s second half was what we expected to see from the talented Swede. Once he figured out how to weave his skill and passing game into the north-south North American game, Ekberg looked infinitely better. Ekberg could ultimately be one of the steals on the draft.” - Tony Ferrari

David Bedkowski - Defense - Owen Sound Attack
Highest Ranking: 10th (1x)
Total Votes: 1
Comments:
“Perhaps I’m on an island with David Bedkowski in my 35-40 range, but his grit and physicality are superb. He delivers bone-crushing hits and throws everything and the kitchen sink at forwards stationed in front of his net. Unfortunately, his hockey IQ is nowhere near where it needs to be to even dream of making an NHL top four. His inability to break out the puck using passes can get him trapped in his own zone, and he often disregards the play to make a big hit. Nonetheless, Bedkowski has the size, will, and tenacity to be an extremely effective bottom-pairing defenseman whose value in the playoffs will skyrocket when the physicality picks up and the whistles are put away. In the early to mid-second round, I’d be happy to take a difference maker who can set the tone of games.” - Kaeden Ireland

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

My Final Top 50 OHL Players for the 2025 NHL Entry Draft - Part 2: 20-1

The second and final part of my 2025 rankings release.

It was certainly great to see the OHL return to the forefront of draft coverage this year with an extremely strong crop. I think all the guys in my top ten have a chance of being first round selections (even if it's unlikely that all ten are). 

Here's my Top 20:

1. Matthew Schaefer - Defense - Erie Otters
No slight meant to Michael Misa, because he's a terrific player in his own right, but Schaefer is my clear number one. He's one of my favourite prospects that have come through the OHL in my two decades of covering the league. I have no doubts that he will work towards being one of the top defenseman in the NHL; a building block for whatever team selects him. And no one deserves this success more than Schaefer after everything he's gone through. Resiliency is something that is needed as a pro and he has that. He's not only a future top pairing defender, but a future NHL captain. His skating ability is a sight to behold. His ability to explode out of starts and stops, changing direction quickly, is Cale Makar 'esque and it's why Makar is someone Schaefer compares himself to. Schaefer is also such an intelligent player. Does he play a completely mistake free game? No, it would be impossible given how he likes to activate offensively. However, Schaefer doesn't make the same mistake twice. Look at how he consistently rises to the challenge and progresses, even in a short window. In his rookie OHL season, he focused on the defensive side of the game most. This year, he exploded offensively. At the U18's as an underager a year ago, he started out as a depth player and finished as Canada's best defender. At this year's U20's, he wasn't even guaranteed a roster spot and then was Canada's best defender prior to injury...all as one of the youngest players in the tournament. Defensively, he's a competitor. He blocks shots. He battles for positioning. His physical engagement and effectiveness as a physical player improved a lot this year and I think that once his frame fills out, he could actually end up being even more effective as a defensive player. So what's the weakness? The only real weakness Schaefer has is his shot. His wrister is designed to simply get pucks through. He doesn't have a one timer in the repertoire. Could that develop? Absolutely. I look at Schaefer as someone in the mold of a Drew Doughty or Duncan Keith. That's well worth the first overall pick. Don't overthink this Islanders.

2. Michael Misa - Center/Wing - Saginaw Spirit
What a year for the Red Tilson winner. He finished the season with 62 goals and 134 points. This tied John Tavares for the most points by a U18 player in the last 25 years. His 2.06 points per game were the most by a U18 player since Connor McDavid averaged 2.55 in 2015 (and the fourth most in the last 25 years behind McDavid, Sam Gagner, and Jason Spezza). Coming into the year everyone wanted to see Misa live up to the hype of being an exceptional status player; to take that next step as one of the OHL's best after being more of a complementary/support piece for Saginaw his first two years. He did that and more, all while shifting back to center full time. Like Schaefer, Misa doesn't really have a significant flaw. His defensive game has improved a ton. His decision making with the puck has improved a ton. Maybe he doesn't stick down the middle, but I think he's capable. If anything, it'll depend on who drafts him and what they need from him. One thing that's not mentioned enough about Misa is that he's not small. There's a very good chance that he plays in the NHL at 6'2, 200lbs (if he gains another inch). That could take his already solid and underrated physical game to another level. Like Schaefer, Misa is a player you can build your franchise around.

3. Brady Martin - Center - Soo Greyhounds
Before you accuse me of recency bias, go back and track my work and comments from the year. I’ve consistently had Martin ranked high. I’m just a huge fan of the person and his game. If he were playing for a stronger team this year (no offense meant to the Greyhounds organization), he would have been receiving this kind of hype all year, not just after an incredible U18 performance. Martin is a dog on a bone. He’s just so competitive. He’s going to be a fan favourite, a locker room favourite, a coaches favourite, and someone who helps you win playoff games. His skill level is being criminally underrated by outlets that call him a third liner. The same things were said about a guy like Mike Richards back in the day. I see Martin as the new age Mike Peca and that’s worth a lot. Back to his skill level, Martin led the OHL in successfully completed dekes this year. He can beat defenders one on one and he can create extra time and space to make plays. His skating has improved by leaps and bounds in the last calendar year too. I no longer see it as an issue, even if there’s room for further improvement. People forget that Martin is a down to Earth farm boy who hasn’t truly dedicated himself to offseason training the way that others in this age group have. Once he does, expect him to get even better. Look, there are some concerns and I’d be foolish not to mention those. For one, his puck management does need to get better. He led the OHL in offensive zone turnovers and unsuccessful dekes too. But, I truly believe a lot of that comes from trying to do too much for a Greyhounds team that needed a spark. At the U18’s, he showed refinement in his game and was much more in control offensively. However, the other thing you could argue is related to that. At the U18’s, he played the wing and looked fantastic. Is he better suited to do that at the pro level, simplifying things for him? It’s possible. But this is just my type of player. 

4. Porter Martone - Wing - Brampton Steelheads
Having Martone below Martin is going to be surprising to a lot of people, but I guarantee you that there are some in the industry at the NHL level who have the same opinion. It’s also important to note that just because I have Martone fourth doesn’t mean I don’t like him as a prospect. He’s a top seven guy for me all day and someone I expect to have a long career. I just prefer Martin and have a preference for players like him. In regards to Martone, I think one thing that’s worth mentioning is that I believe he has been miscast a bit as a potential power forward. I don’t think that’s his true nature or calling card. He’s incredibly pesky. He’s a pain in the butt to play against. However, he’s not an incredibly physical player in puck pursuit, or in terms of winning battles along the wall. He’s a high skill guy who happens to be extremely irritating. Think Corey Perry. Think Brad Marchand. As an offensive player, Martone is the complete package. Great shot. Great off puck instincts. Underrated passer and playmaker. I actually don’t have as much of an issue with his skating or pace as others do. He skates just fine for the type of game he plays. He’s not going to be a guy you rely upon in transition at the pro level. He’s going to be that guy who keeps plays alive in the offensive end, who can create time/space, who can play with really good play driving pivots. So what are my true concerns? First would be the lack of consistent engagement in pursuit and in the defensive end. He has great upside to be a dominant player in this regard with his size/length/smarts, yet he’s just not consistently impactful there. And as a third year OHL player with a late birthday and a ton of experience…that concerns me a bit. This is likely the kind of role NHL teams will want him to play and if he’s not consistently showing this at the junior level, what does that mean for him at the NHL level? Additionally, under pressure, I’ve found his decision making to be lacking a bit when he’s asked to drive play. The production was great this year, but Brampton massively underperformed as a team and I thought Martone struggled at times in the playoffs from trying to force things. But we’re nitpicking here, mostly to help you understand why I prefer Martin. I expect Martone to be a consistent 30/30 guy who has a long NHL career. Any NHL team will be lucky to add him into the fold.

5. Kashawn Aitcheson - Defense - Barrie Colts
Another ranking that will probably surprise you. But I’m just a big Aitcheson fan for the same reason as I’m a Brady Martin fan. This is the kind of guy you want on your team, in your top four, come playoff time. In Corey Pronman’s scouting confidential piece for The Athletic, an executive compared Aitcheson to a better version of Radko Gudas and that’s pretty much it. His game improved so much this year on the offensive side of things that I actually believe he can continue to be an asset offensively at the NHL level. So much of what he does offensively is off the puck or created by his shooting ability, and both of those things can translate well. His big shot could make him a triggerman on the powerplay. And his ability to slip coverage in the offensive end can make him an even strength point producer. He’s going to have to simplify things and improve his decision making with the puck in the defensive end, but what junior aged defender doesn’t have that as something to work on before they turn pro? Additionally, for as combative and physical as he is, I’d like to see him be a little more effective in zone coverage. If he wants to be a top notch defensive player at the next level, he’s got to do a better job of being “smothering.” I’ve heard some question his ‘IQ” as a defensive player, and that’s where that comes from. The argument that I’d have is that you can’t be as intelligent as Aitcheson is off the puck offensively and have a poor IQ. There are also some concerns about his mobility, but I think those are overblown. He moves just fine for the kind of game he plays. I just look at Aitcheson and see someone who is going to be a solid, physical, tone setting number four for a decade in the league and that has a ton of value to me. 

6. Jake O'Brien - Center - Brantford Bulldogs
Let me present you with some statistical rankings. O’Brien finished first in the OHL in powerplay points, powerplay assists, and primary assists with the man advantage. But, at even strength? He was outside the top 50 in both total assists and primary assists. Is this a concern for scouts? It really depends on your perspective. On one hand, you have to be impressed with his vision and playmaking ability with the extra time and space afforded to him; he truly is one of this draft’s premier distributors and creators. On the other hand, you have to be concerned with the consistency of his production at five on five; he struggles to find the space necessary to utilize his creative gifts. That’s why O’Brien is more of a mid first round prospect for me. I just struggle with how certain elements of his game could translate to the NHL at even strength. The pace. The strength on the puck. The physicality. Of course, all three of these things could massively improve with added strength to his slight frame. That’s the argument for O’Brien in the top ten. And it’s valid. As stated, he is such a smart player. He’s actually competitive too, especially in the defensive end. There's a reason why he was used on the PK by Brantford. He’ll block shots. He’s got an active stick and great instincts. If the physical intensity ticks up, he’s a potential Selke candidate. At even strength this year, his goal scoring improved a ton because he was getting to the net and scoring the greasy goals. That’s going to translate too if the strength improves. There’s tons to like, but also a lot that I’m concerned about that has me reserved in my opinion of him. Again, it’s just a personal preference.

7. Jack Nesbitt - Center - Windsor Spitfires
I feel for Nesbitt a bit because I felt like he had a pretty underwhelming U18’s and it squashed a bit of the draft momentum that he had built up based off his in season improvements with Windsor. There’s a reason why Nesbitt was voted as the Western Conference’s most improved player in this year’s coaches poll. Last year as an OHL rookie, he really was quite poor. He struggled with pace. He looked lost physically. He struggled to make plays with the puck. This year, a complete 180. So then you have to ask yourself, is this a big pivot who is a late bloomer from a coordination perspective? There’s a reason why big players take longer to develop. I also really appreciate that Nesbitt realized that he finally needed to use his size to be an effective offensive and two-way player. This was a knock on him as an OHL draft eligible player too. It’s like the lightbulb went on. Now? He’s aggressive in getting to the net and has great hands in tight. He’s assertive in puck pursuit and will lay the body to force turnovers. He’s a reliable three zone player who was used by the Spitfires to close out games. A lot of people have concerns about his skating but I don’t. I think he moves just fine and can build speed without the puck. With it? He’s a lot slower and that’s where that perception comes from. But I see it more as a need to improve his pace and ability to handle, as opposed to skating concerns. If you’re drafting Nesbitt in the first round, which I expect to happen, you’re hoping that he can develop into an Adam Lowry kind of player and that has significant value in the second half of the first round.

8. Cameron Reid - Defense - Kitchener Rangers
I'm at a personal crossroads with Reid. I both really like him, but am also scared of drafting players with his profile in the first round. We've seen so many similar OHL defenders struggle to take that next step. Yet...I remain a fan of his game and his skill set. Reid is one of the best skaters in this entire draft class. He's effortless moving in all directions, but also quick to pick up speed and that makes him potentially so versatile. He can lead the charge in transition and really gained confidence in his carrying ability this year. He quarterbacks the powerplay well with his ability to work inside and escape coverage thanks to his feet. He shows upside as a rush defender with good gap control and an active stick. Outside the feet, I also think Reid is a very intelligent defender. Good scanning habits. Understands when to take chances and when to play it safe. Reid has a great exit pass. There's a lot to like. The question is, how much can his defensive play improve and can it translate to the NHL level? Reid isn't huge and he's not a physically assertive player. Will this grow as he does and will it prevent him from being someone who who needs to be sheltered at the NHL level? Additionally, is he creative/skilled enough to be a big point producer from the back-end, to offset potential defensive concerns? And therein lies the issue, as other similar types have struggled to make the jump the last decade. I'd be willing to bet on the combination of mobility and IQ, but maybe not quite as early as some others.

9. Malcolm Spence - Wing - Erie Otters
One of the most interesting things to come out of the combine was the height measurement of Spence, who has historically been listed at 6'2...but measured 6'0 (and three quarters) at the combine. I think that this is going to be a big talking point for some NHL scouting staffs. I know it sounds crazy, but Spence's projection was already, best case scenario, a solid middle six, defensive type. Will NHL scouting staffs be as enamored with him in that role now that he's not 6'2? He's a late born 2006 too, so there isn't going to be as much room for future growth. All that said, I think Spence is still a quality pick in the 25-40 range. I just appreciate how he's proven to be a big game player. He's been fantastic as a role player for Canada internationally. He was great in the playoffs this year for Erie, helping them upset the Spirit. There are times where I wish he were just a bit more consistent physically, but when he's on, he's such a tough player to match up against with his speed, strength, and sense. Do I think his offensive upside is significant? No. I don't see him as a creative playmaker or finisher. But, I think he can be a 20/20 guy who can play a shut down role and help your team win when it matters most. Maybe a bit obscure, but I think of a guy like Pascal Dupuis and how valuable he was to his teams. The decision to head to Michigan is an interesting one...and it was trendsetting to a degree. His game is definitely tailored to playing well in College though. It'll be interesting to see how he performs offensively for the Wolverines.

10. Henry Brzustewicz - Defense - London Knights
I don't agree with the notion that Brzustewicz has middling upside, as I've seen some suggest in the scouting sphere. I would actually argue that Brzustewicz has among the highest upside of any defender available. There's a wide range of outcomes here because I see him as someone still searching for a true identity; he's a bit of a blank canvas currently. He could easily develop into a top three defender, who plays in all situations, under the tutelage of the Hunters in London. He could also lean more towards his defensive ability and become more of a PK type. Or, he could fail to create that true identity and struggle to make the NHL. At the beginning of the season for London, prior to the arrival of the big guns, Brzustewicz looked really comfortable running the powerplay. He was slipping coverage, getting pucks to the middle, using his big strides to get the puck into the offensive zone. He's got the big point shot too. Then once Dickinson and Bonk returned to action, Brzustewicz slipped back into a more defensively oriented role, often pairing with Dickinson. And in that role, he sometimes looked uncomfortable and his puck management suffered. This has led to some questions regarding his IQ. And I do see it. He can chase the play defensively and get taken out of position. He can turn the puck over. However, he's also a good athlete who could be capable of some pretty awesome things when his game becomes more refined. He's a different player than his brother Hunter. He's longer. He's more physical. There really is great upside at both ends of the ice. 

11. Ethan Czata - Center/Wing - Niagara IceDogs
A personal favourite of mine. It's just so easy to see his game translating to the pro level in some capacity. Good size. Good skater. Hard on pucks. Strong two-way player. Versatile positionally and situationally. Underrated playmaker. The IceDogs made the playoffs this year for the first time in a while and Czata was one of the main reasons. Are there limitations to his upside currently? Yeah, I do believe so. He can struggle to handle with pace at times, especially under pressure. This doesn't allow him to truly utilize his speed offensively. I don't think he's a natural finisher in the home plate area. However, with work, both of these things can be improved a bit, to the point where I could see him being a solid 3C or complementary 2W. I thought Czata was really solid for Canada in a depth role at the U18's, killing penalties, working the cycle; grinding it out basically. NHL teams give up first round selections for guys like that come playoff time, so why not draft them in the second round and develop them? 

12. Jack Ivankovic - Goaltender - Brampton Steelheads
Did Ivankovic get the kiss of death at the combine when he measured at 5'11? Historical draft data would suggest yes, unfortunately. I know that his father was huge and that there is evidence Jack hits a late growth spurt. To some NHL teams, who have size requirements for the position...that won't matter. For me, I'm still an Ivankovic fan, but maybe not as much as some others in the scouting community. He's a late second/early third rounder for me. I wasn't blown away with his season in the OHL, where I thought he struggled with his rebound control, angles, and ability to fight through traffic at times...and the stats back that up (even if the Steelheads defense was also decimated by injuries at different times). Of course, you'd be hard pressed to find someone who wasn't blown away by his international performances this year. He was outstanding for Canada at both the Hlinka/Gretzky and the U18's. When he's dialed in, he's really tough to beat, size or not. He's lightning quick. He tracks the play well. He competes to make saves. He's aggressive in challenging shooters and trying to take away angles. Will that hold up at the higher levels to become a Saros, Wolf, Quick, Hasek, etc? I think it's worth trying to find out in the range that I said. It's also worth noting that Ivankovic is one of the better puck handling goaltenders that I've seen come through the OHL. He's like a third defender back there. It's a bit of a lost art, but it really can make a difference on the ice when you have a goaltender who is a confident playing the puck to take some pressure off the defense. Obviously, I'm sure you've heard by now about Ivankovic's commitment to Michigan and it'll present a new challenge as he tries to shore up their goaltending and become their starter.

13. Alexei Medvedev - Goaltender - London Knights
A player who has been criminally underrated this year based on the fact that he didn’t play a ton down the stretch and in the playoffs for London; it was obviously the Austin Elliott show. That adds a bit of mystique to Medvedev, because we didn’t get to see his true progression over the year or to see how he performed under pressure in the playoffs. But, I’m a big fan and I think he and Ivankovic are basically 1A and 1B. Medvedev is a great athlete, but he’s also 6’3 and one of the youngest players available this year (Sept. 10 birth date), which means he could grow even more. I like how he tracks the play and I like how aggressive he is in challenging shooters. He can get caught out of position sometimes and his rebound control needs work; refinement is needed in some technical areas. However, this was his first year in the OHL and he’s going to be London’s starter moving forward…which is obviously going to be great for his development. For my money, he’s right in the conversation as the best goalie available and he should be a top two round pick.

14. Jimmy Lombardi - Center - Flint Firebirds
I continue to be aggressively high on Lombardi. Yes, consistency was a major issue. Yes, he needs to majorly bulk up. But, even with those issues, he led the Firebirds in assists this year. He was also among the OHL’s leaders in defensive and neutral zone takeaways. Oh…and he was among the OHL’s leaders in successfully completed dekes. I see a pivot with skill, creativity, and sense. He can be a real difference maker in transition with how he can create mismatches by taking defenders out of position. And even without elite skating ability or even adequate strength on the puck, he manages to cut through the middle and get to the net. When he gets that space, he looks good as a playmaker too and doesn't need to alter pace to make plays; his hands are great. Defensively, his awareness and instincts are terrific. He always seems to be in the right place, thus the high takeaway numbers. There are times where you wish he were better under pressure with the puck; he can be prone to offensive zone and neutral zone turnovers. However, I truly believe all of Lombardi's issues are related to him needing to bulk up. It'll help with his skating power and ability to build speed quicker. It'll help him be stronger on pucks and, in turn, help him cut down on turnovers. The upside here, IMO, is for him to develop into a really solid number two, all situations kind of center. But, I also believe he has a floor as an NHL player in some capacity too, obviously depending on how those physical tools improve. Lots to like and a player who shouldn't have fallen as much as he did on some lists in the second half.

15. Luca Romano - Center/Wing - Kitchener Rangers
For Romano, it’s all about adding strength and improving his conditioning, which will in turn improve his consistency. He has all the tools, but he still gets overwhelmed physically at the OHL level and that limits his impact. It was kind of a yo-yo act for him this year. I like the skating ability, particularly given how so much of his game is created in transition and out of hard work in puck pursuit. He has that elusiveness to counter his lack of true size. I also think Romano is an intelligent player. Sees the ice well. Understands how to play without the puck in all three zones. He projects as a versatile guy who can slide up and down the lineup. Two areas of his game that I actually see developing into major assets for him are his shot and his physicality/tenacity. The shot flashes plus upside; he can really rip it, both from a standstill and while in motion. But, because he can struggle to shake coverage sometimes, he's just not getting to those spots and giving himself enough time right now. The tenacity and physicality is there, he's just not effective currently because he's not strong enough. But as the conditioning improves, I think it's going to be a hallmark of his game. I guess the concerns I have are related to the fact that I'm not sure Romano is a center moving forward to the pro level. He's not an overly creative player; he's better in straight lines. And I think he'll settle into more of a high energy, goal scoring kind of role on the wing. Given that he's not huge, it makes his projection a little more murky. I wonder if he's the kind of guy who falls into that third/fourth round range at the draft. If he does, I think that would be amazing value...but I see the reasoning.

16. Tyler Hopkins - Center/Wing - Kingston Frontenacs
I absolutely love the versatility in Hopkins' game. He's a bit of a Swiss army knife. His game improved by leaps and bounds from his rookie year. He can play center or the wing. He can kill penalties or look comfortable in any role on the powerplay. He loves to attack the offensive zone with pace, but he's worked hard to improve his off puck play to the point where he is a valuable forechecker and three zone player. His skill and creativity with the puck is best on display when he's attacking in transition. Can beat guys wide with speed and cut back in; he's far from a perimeter player. However, the lack of true identity; the concept of him being a Swiss army knife also concerns me about his upside and projection. What is he at the next level? The finishing ability needs to improve, first and foremost. He struggled to finish off plays this year, especially in tight. I think the key for him is leaning into the pest like role that he plays sometimes. If he can continue to get stronger and make the physical part of his game more consistent, there could definitely be a place for him in the NHL. He just needs to really spend the next few seasons adapting his game and developing that identity, because I don't think he's going to be the scorer that he was drafted into the OHL to be...or that he was in minor hockey. 

17. Simon Wang - Defense - Oshawa Generals
I fully expect Wang to be drafted well before this. He's going to in the top 45 or so. And I get it. It's just not often you find a defender his size who can move like he does. The ease of his stride and power. The fluidity of his four way mobility. He also flashes the potential to be dominant physically. He can be too passive at times, but when he lays the body...he lays the body. Dudes bounce off him like a pinball. I must say, I was really impressed with the improvements he showed defensively in this year's playoffs. Was taking better routes and showing better gap control. Was a real disruptive force at times with his ability to close in on loose pucks. The offense is still a major work in progress and I guess my concern is that I'm not sure it gets to where it needs to. In the OJHL, he flashed offensive upside. He was working inside and using his shot to create offense. But the adjustment to the OHL has been a tough one for him. He's struggled to make plays under pressure. He hasn't been able to get himself looks to use his shot and his release needs to get way quicker. I guess you could argue, but...Wang has elite defensive upside. I'd probably agree. However, as I've said a bunch in these write ups...there are a lot of these types this year and I think many have shown better puck skill and habits than Wang...yet they aren't universally ranked as high. 

18. Quinn Beauchesne - Defense - Guelph Storm
I do worry about Beauchesne being one of those jack of all trades types that we've discussed previously; the types who have difficulty finding a niche at the NHL level. His season with Guelph was pretty up and down, and we never really saw him take the training wheels off as an offensive defender. Yet...he was so good for Canada internationally this year, I think we need to put a lot of stock in that given that Guelph struggled as a team and that can be difficult for a younger defender. We see this year in, year out at the draft. Defenders on struggling CHL teams get drafted later, but then explode to become solid NHL prospects once the team improves around them and they don't have to force things and become more comfortable. Beauchesne is a really intelligent player. Makes a clean exit pass. Takes good routes to pucks. Has great defensive instincts. Can use his good feet to skate the puck out of trouble or create a shooting lane in the offensive end. I do feel like there is a chance he pops off in the next few years for the Storm. And if he doesn't? I think he's smart enough, mobile enough, and long enough to be a depth, defensive type at the NHL level. If he's drafted outside of the third round, it's a major value pick by whatever NHL team selects him.

19. Filip Ekberg - Wing - Ottawa 67's
Will the real Filip Ekberg please stand up? Illness and injury may have played a role in his slow start, but he had a difficult time earning ice time and responsibility from 67’s head coach Dave Cameron. His start was so lacklustre that we’re not sure a lot of folks in the scouting community took notice of his terrific finish to the OHL season, where he had 24 points in the last 18 games of the year. But, they certainly took notice of his performance at the U18’s, where he led the tournament in scoring and was named tournament MVP, dominating touches on a Swedish team with several first round candidates. I could see an argument for having him higher, but I'm just a bit concerned about the lack of physical/athletic tools. Not a big guy. Not exceptionally quick or strong. Defensive game was hit and miss. His shot might be his best offensive weapon, but I don't see him getting into spots to use it enough. At the U18's he shined as a transitional attacker, showing skill and a great passing touch. But, is he going to dominate touches at the NHL level without some serious upgrades to those physical tools? Does he profile as more of a complementary piece? With the tumultuous season he had, I just find myself confused over his projection. That's why I have him as a third rounder and not more.

20. Owen Griffin - Center - Oshawa Generals
Since 2000, the only U18 players with more points in the OHL playoffs than Owen Griffin (29) were Connor McDavid, Taylor Hall, Jeff Skinner, Max Domi, and Ryan Ellis. It tied or surpassed the likes of Sam Gagner, Robby Fabbri, Mike Richards, Matt Duchene, and Nazem Kadri. Not bad company. That helps to explain Griffin’s late season surge up draft boards. He went from being a draft long shot to a potential top three round pick. His meteoric rise of 127 spots on NHL Central Scouting’s final rankings is evidence of that. I really applaud him for improving so much this year. The skating uptick has been the most noticeable difference. It was previously a weakness, now it's getting close to a strength. And he's putting the improved quickness to use without the puck, operating really well as someone who hounds and hunts pucks. It's why he's been very useful as a penalty killer. Griffin has also increased his physical intensity level over the course of the year. His ability to get to the middle and be stronger playing through traffic was one of the main reasons he was so good in the OHL playoffs. In summary, Griffin has managed to completely change the narrative surrounding him to become a reliable three zone player who can use his high end sense and tenaciousness to hunt touches and create chances. Obviously, the concern is similar to others in this range. He's not huge. He's not a truly dynamic or creative offensive player. His skating will still need to tick up more given his size. His future position remains up for debate. There are projection concerns. However, how could you not move Griffin up your board based on in season progression?







Monday, June 9, 2025

My Final Top 50 OHL Players for the 2025 NHL Entry Draft - Part 1: 50-21

The first part of my rankings release for the 2025 NHL Draft. 

For those that have been following my work for years, I'm condensing down to only two parts for this. Part one includes the players ranked 21 through 50. Part two will include the players in my top 20.

Just for clarification, for my top 50 ranking, I haven't included any players eligible for draft re-entry, such as Kristian Epperson. This has been consistent all the way through my lists. Instead, I did a list of the top 10 draft re-entries, which can be found here.

Also for clarification, this list is MY list of the top 50 OHL prospects, as if I were drafting for my own team. In other words, this isn't a list of where I THINK or believe players will go, but a ranking of my own opinion on the top players eligible for this draft based on my viewings this season. If you want a draft projection and information about players outside the OHL, be sure to check out McKeens Hockey. As you may know (or not know) I am the scouting director for McKeen's and our draft guide will be released extremely soon (purchasing information is available on the linked site).

In recent years, less and less players ranked in this range from the OHL have been drafted. The reality is that NHL teams are using mid to late round picks on European and College bound players more often these days because they get a longer signing window in regards to their rights. Longer shot prospects take longer to develop because they have more to work on. That longer window allows them a few extra years to see how they progress before they have to hand out an ELC. Additionally, in the mid to later rounds, teams are using picks on second/third year eligible CHL players who have already shown positive growth. That said, how will the new NCAA eligibility rules affect this? Will teams be more willing to bet on CHL players late, in hopes of eventually extending their signing window by pushing them to the NCAA?

Without further ado, here are the players ranked 21 through 50.

21. Carson Cameron - Defense - Peterborough Petes
I really thought that Cameron would end up being this year's Ben Danford. A solid, intelligent, and competitive two-way defender who could eventually rise to the point where team's would consider him in the first round. But he just didn't have a terrific year for a Petes' team that struggled. Just out of necessity, he was tasked with having to do too much and his game lost focus. To an extent, I think he lost his identity as a defensively oriented player. Turnovers were an issue from trying to make plays with the puck. His overall puck management and decision making lacked. This hurt his defensive game as it felt like he was having to chase too much, or the Petes were just hemmed in their own end too much. The good news? I think there's still an NHL prospect in there and I think he'll be fine in the long run. But he's got to get back to the basics and that means Peterborough needs to bring in a defender who can play a larger role offensively to take some pressure off of him. Cameron is mobile. He can be combative in the defensive end. He defends the rush well. He has a good point shot that should eventually develop into a better weapon when he can play more confident off the puck. The NHL upside isn't likely too huge, but he could definitely be a third pairing defender with some adjustments. He's still got a lot going for him.

22. Shamar Moses - Wing - North Bay Battalion
Moses is a big winger who is at his best as a playmaker/passer. That's pretty rare to find. His ability to protect the puck and his poise under pressure allows him to find passing lanes out of the cycle, or when driving the net. He's got soft hands too, and he can make skilled plays with the puck to extend time/space. I thought that Moses' off puck game improved a lot in the second half and I think he'll eventually be a solid two-way player. He just didn't end the season well offensively. He had a single goal in the last 25 games of the season (including the playoffs). He needs to get quicker and he needs to find a way to be more of an impactful player between the dots given his size. Right now, he's kind of a big man without a true identity as a potential pro. I don't think he's quite skilled or quick enough to be a top six option and he's not as quick or as tenacious as teams are looking for from their bottom six these days. So something needs to give. It definitely can, but with a weaker finish to the year, he's probably more of a mid/late round target now.

23. David Bedkowski - Defense - Owen Sound Attack
He's 100% going to go higher than this. There's no question about it. He's big. He's physical. He's mobile. There is a projection here as a top notch stay at home defender. I guess I just haven't seen enough growth in his game as a third year player (and late birthday) to warrant the kind of high ranking he's receiving from some outlets (and from NHL scouts). Has his play with the puck truly improved over three seasons in the OHL? I don't think there's been much progression at all. Now, of course, that's not going to be his bread and butter at the next level. However, as is, he would get feasted upon in the NHL in his own end because of his lack of excellent scanning habits and ability to make plays under pressure. A lot of the top end defensive defenders in the NHL were decent puck movers at the junior level before taking on a lesser role at the higher levels. We've seen players with this profile before and they've struggled to make the jump. I'd have a ton of time for Bedkowski in the mid rounds. But, this is a draft that has a ton of quality athletic, stay at home types available this year from other regions (from my crossover work with McKeen's), and I think a lot of those guys have more to offer from an offensive perspective, while possessing the same kind of defensive upside.

24. Aidan Lane - Wing - Brampton Steelheads
Simply put...if Lane was an even adequate skater, he'd be much higher than this and a serious top two round candidate. As he showed late in the year with Brampton, he can be the perfect complement to highly skilled or creative playmakers because he's one of those guys that does all the little things well. He's a highly intelligent player who creates space and extra time for those players to operate. He embraces his role as a net front presence and has really good hands in tight for tips and second chance put aways. He controls the wall well and he makes quick decisions with the puck. Even with the skating deficiencies, he didn't turn the puck over much in the offensive or neutral zones. But, he's just so hard to project to that complementary offensive role at higher levels because those types at the NHL level are often quite physical or quite quick, or both...and Lane is neither. He just needs to focus every ounce of his being on trying to get quicker and he'll have tons of time to do that with the route he plans on taking (OHL to NCAA). 

25. Lev Katzin - Wing - Guelph Storm
Katzin really turned some heads with his performance at the U18's for Canada to close out the year. I know that he was good for Guelph after signing out of the USHL, but it was interesting to see him in a different light. He was especially good on the powerplay for Canada, where he put his excellent vision and playmaking ability on display. I think what's most admirable about Katzin is that he's not a perimeter player, despite giving up size. He's competitive and he hunts his touches in the offensive end. There really is significant offensive upside here. But, if we're projecting players to the NHL...where does Katzin fit into that as a winger without high end physical tools? He's not a poor skater, but he's not the kind of dynamic or explosive skater you'd like to see given his size. His three zone play needs to become more consistent too. For that, I see him as that classic boom/bust smaller player and we know what history has said about that combination. Outside the 4th round? I'd be all over this because of the boom potential. But inside that range? I'd be more hesitant. 

26. Travis Hayes - Wing - Soo Greyhounds
Classic high energy type. Plays up tempo. Great on the forecheck. Attacks the net. Shows scoring upside with a pretty quick release and good scoring instincts. Basically Travis is like a hybrid between his brothers Gavin and Avery. Offensive consistency was an issue for Travis this year on a middling Greyhounds club, but he did finish the season on a real high note. In the last 27 games of the year (including the playoffs), Hayes had 32 points, including 13 goals. Given his late season strong play, I could see an NHL team drafting him inside the top 100. He's going to be a big part of the resurgence in the Soo in the coming years. However, I also believe that there will be hesitancy over the fact that he's one of those high energy, jack of all trades types who can have trouble at the pro level. There just isn't a trait that could be called significantly above average and when you factor in his average size, that's something that could hold him back. But, Hayes does have middle six upside.

27. Kieren Dervin - Center - Kingston Frontenacs
Admittedly a player that I had a difficult time getting a read on this year; I just don't know what to make of him. His playing style in the prep loop with St. Andrews was way different than how he played with Kingston in the OHL. Is he a power pivot? Is he more of a rangy, skilled playmaker? He just needs to bulk up to be able to play through traffic at the OHL level. He had trouble maintaining possession and driving play with Kingston and didn't have that same jam to his game that I saw with SAC. Obviously, you could look at that and be extremely interested in Dervin because he's a good sized center who skates well, flashes upside as a creative handler, and who might end up being a power forward type once he fills out. On the flip side, you might look at Dervin and wonder what the true projection to the pro level is. If you're convinced that his development takes off once he bulks up and gains confidence, you take Dervin in the top three rounds.

28. Joshua Avery - Center - Brantford Bulldogs
There's just something about Avery that makes me believe that he'll end up being an NHL prospect at some point. On a strong Bulldogs team, he didn't get the consistent ice time that he needed to shine offensively. But, I found his effort admirable. He has a clear understanding of how he needs to play to be successful. He's a power center, through and through. He gets to the net. He skates hard (and has some power to his stride). He shows great instincts and competitiveness in all three zones. I think of the way a guy like Barclay Goodrow developed over his time in the OHL and eventually became a quality NHL player and I wonder if Avery is capable of a similar path. I see them as similar players at the same age. 

29. Parker Snelgrove - Center - Guelph Storm
Basically what I just wrote about Avery goes the same for Snelgrove. He just passed the eye test too many times for me this year, even with inconsistent ice time. He skates well, but he currently is faster without the puck than he is with it. As that confidence grows, will his offensive production sky rocket? He's also detail oriented and is strong without the puck. He's great in puck pursuit, intelligent as a defensive player, and he works hard to play the net front and did a lot of his offensive damage from there this year. Could Snelgrove develop into a Casey Cizikas type at the NHL level? I think it's very possible. Like Avery, I have a ton of time for him in the later rounds.

30. Jake Crawford - Center/Wing - Owen Sound Attack
Crawford was quite good to start the year for the Attack, playing big minutes. But he really faded in the second half, was moved to the wing and that kind of pushed him to the periphery. But, I really like the tools here. He's got great size and great wheels. At times this year, he's shown a real knack for hunting pucks and creating chances out of turnovers. The big issue is the lack of improvement over the year in his puck play and skill. He can struggle to play with pace with the puck and he had trouble finishing chances. The hands just need to improve. If you're drafting Crawford, you're hoping that he can develop a true identity as a tenacious, two-way player who could be a real asset on the PK and defensively. But the offensive abilities need to tick up for that to happen.

31. Lucas Karmiris - Center/Wing - Brampton Steelheads
Injuries were a real issue for Karmiris this year as it seemed like he never truly got healthy. He just never really developed a rhythm to his game the way that he did in the second half last year. And with him being a late birthday in his third year in the league, that plateau in development is going to be concerning to NHL scouts. That said, there are some nice tools. He skates pretty well. He has great three zone instincts and should develop into a really good PK option at the pro level (somewhere). He flashes an ability to drive the middle with skill and funnel pucks to the net. But, like some others in this range, he just hasn't truly developed an identity yet and that's where the problem lies. Projecting him as an NHL player currently is a bit problematic. 

32. Lirim Amidovski - Wing - North Bay Battalion
There are definitely some pro level attributes here. Amidovski has a pro frame. He builds speed well North/South and can drive the net. He has scoring upside with a heavy shot. He flashes a physical game, especially in puck pursuit. The issue is that none of these things are consistent. And as a late born 2006, I would have wanted greater production and consistency. While the linear stride is strong and powerful to create speed, he struggles with his agility and working off his edges and that makes him easy to contain for a lot of OHL defenders. Additionally, his playmaking sense and overall skill needs to improve to make him less "one note." But I'd actually be shocked if Amidovski wasn't selected given that he is still a raw prospect despite his older age. With the new NCAA eligibility rules in place, an NHL team could give him a ton of time to develop. At 23/24, he could actually be a dangerous player with the right adjustments.

33. Xander Velliaris - Defense - Saginaw Spirit
He definitely got more ice time after the trade from Kingston and that unquestionably helped his development. However, I don't think it necessarily gave us better information about the kind of pro Velliaris would be. He just needs to embrace and develop an identity. However, because he's so raw (a bit of a blank canvas), he's actually one of my favourite later round sleepers for this year. He's big. He's mobile. He's shown offensive upside at times, be it as a powerplay QB or a transition player. He's shown to be physical and tough to play against. It's just that none of those things are happening consistently or at the same time. But, this could easily be someone who absolutely pops off down the line with the right development. Or, he could be out of the OHL by his OA year. The wide range of outcomes is what makes it scary. Will NHL teams take a wait and see approach? 

34. Harry Nansi - Wing - Owen Sound Attack
The amateur and "X" scouting community's OHL favourite, but I just haven't seen it. I'm much more in line with NHL Central Scouting's ranking for him. Look, I appreciate that he's got the frame and mindset to be a quality checking line player in the NHL. He's clearly an intelligent player who impresses in the defensive end especially. He works hard along the wall to keep plays alive. When he fills out, he could be a real tough matchup for OHL defenders below the hash marks. But, I don't see an NHL caliber skater. He's got a real wild base and doesn't generate a ton of power in his strides. I don't see high end finishing ability or someone who's going to be a dominant transitional attacker. I'd happily use a later round pick on Nansi hoping that as he adds muscle, his game takes off, but I don't buy some of the rankings I see of him in the top 75.

35. Noah Tegelaar - Goaltender - Soo Greyhounds
Firstly, let’s ignore that Tegelaar was thrown to the wolves in his first OHL start against the London Knights. The first three goals against, no goalie in the league was stopping. The next one he would have wanted back because he was caught cheating to the slot. The final one, before he got pulled, was a fluke netfront bank in. He was then sent back to Collingwood to finish the season. Not exactly top shelf goaltending development if you ask me. Tegelaar first came to my attention at the World Junior A Challenge where he was tasked with backstopping an overmatched Canada East team, consistently coming up with big saves to keep games closer than they deserved to be. Tegelaar is a big netminder who seals the bottom of the net really well. He collapses deep, but has quick pads and tracks the play well in scramble situations. Tegelaar also moves decently post to post for a bigger netminder and can sprawl out to make highlight reel saves. He’s far from perfect. Consistency is an issue that I’ve noticed. Sometimes he swallows up initial shots and prevents rebounds, other times, he struggles to corral pucks and gives up second/third chance opportunities. Sometimes he fights through screens for sight lines, other times he gets caught deep and is susceptible to point shots or perimeter shots. There’s also a need for Tegelaar to get quicker out of the butterfly as he can get caught scrambling, without that quickness up/down, or in his pushes when he’s already down. I do truly believe that there is something here. He shows enough in flashes to suggest that he could develop really well under the right tutelage, and once he fills out and gets stronger. There’s some early stages Matt Murray here. 

36. Daniil Skvortsov - Defense - Guelph Storm
Another player that I'm lower on compared to other members of the scouting community. Granted, it was tough for a defender to shine through on the Storm this year. We saw that with Quinn Beauchesne, based on how much better he was for Canada internationally or at premier events. Skvortsov is big and mobile, but that's about the extent of what I see currently. I don't see high end instincts at either end. I wish he were more physically assertive in the defensive end given his size. Puck management was a real issue at times this year. Does he flash offensive upside with the odd impressive rush or nice play inside the offensive blueline? Definitely. Does he have solid defensive upside because of his size, reach, and mobility? Definitely. And that's why I still have him ranked. He's just more of a later round flier for me, as opposed to an earlier round one. There's a bit too much of former Storm Daniil Chayka's complacency in his game for me.

37. Matthew Koporowski - Goaltender - Owen Sound Attack
I think my biggest issue with Koporowski was that I wish he had played more, in addition to there being a clear path for him to play more in the immediate future. He's big and he's quick in his crease. The rest of his game needs refining. But, for some NHL teams that will be enough, because goaltenders do take longer to develop and refine. However, the smaller sample size this year in combination with his inconsistency makes it tough, especially given that it's a really solid goaltending crop this year (overall for the draft). Next year, is he stuck behind Carter George again? Is there going to be a trade, given that Trenten Bennett is also in the fold if he doesn't go to the NCAA early? Koporowski is likely to be a pick and I have no qualms with that because there is upside. However, I'm just not sure I saw enough to truly say...this guy is going to be an NHL netminder.

38. Ruslan Karimov - Wing - Sarnia Sting
Karimov is definitely best described as an enigma. His ice time fluctuated this year (due to performance issues). His play style fluctuated this year from game to game. Yet, the upside still remains very high. This is a highly skilled and creative player. He can create that extra time and space for himself. He also can be fairly physical...again to help create that space for himself. The combination of skill and tenacity is a good one to have. Yet, it's what he does with that time and space that has him ranked this low. Maybe it was just the adjustment to playing in North America, but his decision making with and without the puck badly needs to improve. Things like understanding spacing, timing cuts, neutral zone and defensive zone positioning, heads up passing and pre scans. It's not really there. When you combine that with the fact that he's an average skater currently, it helps to explain why he wasn't able to get the best out of his skill set this year as a much hyped Import. I really hope he stays in Sarnia though. I think they have a solid young team that's going to boom at some point. And the coaches can work with him through building some of those good habits on the ice. The upside is still quite high. I just can't rank him higher with so many issues currently.

39. Caden Taylor - Wing - Peterborough Petes
I definitely didn't envision having Taylor this low when the season started. I thought that he would pop off at some point. He has among the highest scoring upside of anyone on this list and he has the pro frame to match it. However, I just didn't see much development in his game this year. He's got the great shot, but he wasn't getting himself opportunities to use it. His stride needs to become more explosive to be able to beat defenders to spots and to get inside of coverage. He's not a dynamic player in transition either. I'll give him credit by saying that I thought his physical intensity level did pick up over the course of the year and he started using his size to get to the net at times. That absolutely needs to become more consistent because it will be one of the keys to unlocking his upside. But, does he project as more of a triggerman who needs a high end playmaking pivot to get him the puck? Look, Taylor is probably an NHL pick this year because players with his size and shooting ability don't grow on trees. You're just going to have to be very patient.

40. Evan Passmore - Defense - Barrie Colts
It's probably shocking to see Passmore ranked this low given that I'm usually all over players like him...and I was singing his praises on social media at the start of the year. However, I didn't see a ton of growth in his game from the start of the year to the end, if anything, I thought he struggled with puck management in the second half and playoffs. And as a late born 2006, IMO, there should have been more progress (similar to my views on Bedkowski from above). I love that Passmore is a throw back to yesteryears. He is big. He is mean. He's going to end up being, possibly, a Zach Bell type of OHL defender by the time he graduates out. But, Bell wasn't an NHL prospect either. There are a lot of big, potential shut down defenders available this year and most of them are more mobile than Passmore, and more confident and capable with the puck. I wouldn't advise against using a later round pick on him, I'm just not sure the upside is more than just a solid depth defender at the pro level. 

41. Oliver Turner - Defense - Erie Otters
Massive and impressive stay at home defender who was a defensive stalwart for the St. Andrew’s College program this year. Obviously got in a few games with the Erie Otters too. He’s a really impressive physical specimen. His reach is extremely disruptive and he’s very aggressive at taking away space. Defends high in the defensive zone and neutral zone, shutting down attackers before they build speed to play around him. Turner also brings a consistent physical element, not so much in the way of big open ice hits, but by pinning, sealing, and pushing opponents off pucks. As he further matures physically and his conditioning improves, I’d look for the physical component of his game to dial up even further. What’s really impressive about Turner is his lateral quickness. He closes gaps and pushes to seal the wall very quickly, stopping attackers in their tracks. For such a bigger defender, this is impressive and it gives him a real solid defensive projection for higher levels. Offensively, there’s really not much to speak of. He can make a clean exit pass, but he’s not extremely confident or comfortable with the puck on his stick in the offensive zone. His point shot is currently non existent. In his limited OHL action this year with Erie, Turner also struggled a bit with the pace of play, both in retrievals (his transitional skating does need some work) and timing of his aggressiveness. The team drafting Turner will be hoping that he can develop into a Jan Rutta type at the next level; someone who can be a defensive stalwart and play regularly on the penalty kill, but whose offensive upside is limited. 

42. Tanner Lam - Wing - Kitchener Rangers
No doubt in my mind that Lam will be among the OHL's leading scorers by the time he graduates out of the league. He's incredibly talented and he's smart. His agility and edgework is among the best of any forward in this OHL class. He's so slippery because his hands also work in sync with his feet. So why do I have him ranked so low? Undersized wingers with his profile just have incredibly low hit rates as NHL prospects. He's light on his feet and can turn on a dime, but I think his straight line speed and quickness need to improve given his size. He's also just too easily pushed off the puck or kept to the perimeter currently. Now, I do expect both of these things to improve over his OHL career...I've had people tell me amazing things about Lam and his willingness to improve. However, I'm just not sure his game translates to the NHL level. I mean, look at someone like former Ranger Joseph Garreffa. 

43. Jacob Cloutier - Wing - Saginaw Spirit
Earlier this year (on my midseason list), I had Lam and Cloutier back to back and I'm keep it this way for my final list. Another guy that I think develops into a real top notch OHL player, but I question whether his game is successful at higher levels. Cloutier is like the little engine that could. He never quits on a play. He's a very aggressive forechecker. He gets to the net. He's out there working his butt off every shift and that's incredibly admirable; it's the old adage of playing bigger than he is. He's a fairly skilled and intelligent player too. The thing is, he's not a dynamic or explosive skater for an undersized winger. He's got quick feet, but his shorter strides limit speed development. That dog on a bone mentality will carry him a long way, but it's tough to see him as a standout NHL prospect. 

44. Noah Read - Wing - London Knights
Is Read next in the long line of London forwards who explode in their post draft seasons? I know some scouts who believe that to be the case. Me? I'm a little more skeptical. I like the energy he plays with. He's a strong skater, especially North/South. He is excellent in puck pursuit; strong on the forecheck especially. He gets himself to the net and has a quick release. At times this year, he did show flashes of higher offensive upside. But I'm not sure I see a projection higher than a change of pace, depth forward at the higher levels. I think it's somewhat fair to ask the question, if Read wasn't on the London Knights, would he be firmly on the draft radar? It's a testament to the program and how successful they've been bringing forwards along slowly, but I don't see Read as the next Dvorak or Cowan. However, you could also do a lot worse in the later rounds. Could see a path where he becomes a Jesper Fast kind of player.

45. Blake Arrowsmith - Wing - Niagara IceDogs
I had really high expectations for Arrowsmith after he moved to Niagara, but he just couldn't find any consistency. There is something there. He's a solid athlete. He's got size. He moves well. He can play physical. He shows upside as a scorer with a heavy wrister. But, he's prone to disappearing for stretches and just being "there." What's holding his game back currently? Is it processing? There's a chance that the lightbulb goes on for Arrowsmith and he develops into a real solid prospect; the tools are there. There's a chance that it doesn't and he's out of the league before he graduates out. The hit rate for players traded by the Hunters at a young age is not great, so it makes you wonder. I'm still ranking him because I saw flashes of some really great things this year, but I doubt that he's an NHL pick this year.

46. Jordan Charron - Wing - Soo Greyhounds
Solid North/South, high energy winger. Has good straight line speed. Gets to the net. Works to retrieve pucks. Has a good frame; he'll be a load to handle in transition at some point in his junior career (or NCAA career). However, I'm not sure I see more than just a quality middle six junior player, who can be a solid complement to more creative players. We see a lot of similar players come through the junior ranks and few develop into NHL prospects. If you're drafting Charron, it's because you believe that the skill and finishing ability can tick up with development and that his physicality becomes more apparent so that he can become a Garnet Hathaway, Kiefer Sherwood type. Certainly not impossible.

47. Liam Beamish - Center - Sarnia Sting
I really liked Beamish's game after he came to the OHL. On a lot of nights, he was Sarnia's best player. He's really smart and he makes up for a lack of size/strength with a great motor. Safe to assume he'll be back in the OHL next year before heading to Penn State the year after. I'd expect him to be close to a point per game guy next season. I guess the issue is that he looks like more of a quality OHL player and not a true NHL prospect. He's an average skater. Has average size. Not a high skill or overly creative player. His game is predicated on quick touches. Strong off puck play. Great hustle. Admirable qualities for sure, but not as a high end NHL prospect. However, you could do worse with a late round pick. You hope that the physical tools blossom around his IQ making his pro projection a little more clear.

48. Carson Harmer - Center - Saginaw Spirit
Earlier this year I had Beamish and Harmer lumped together and I think it makes sense for that to continue. They're basically clones of each other. Extremely smart pivots who lack dynamic skating and size. Harmer was great for Saginaw this year in a supporting role. His attention to detail defensively is terrific. He breaks up a lot of plays deep in the defensive end and in the slot with his reads and effort. He's also a great playmaker. Has excellent anticipation and vision. I've said this a few times now but Harmer reminds me a lot of former Ottawa 67 and OHL standout Austen Keating. 

49. Shaan Kingwell - Wing - Ottawa 67's
Kingwell was a player who caught my eye while playing for Canada East at the WJAC’s. He was one of the lone bright spots for the team at the event. Then he signed with the 67's and had some time with them in the second half and will play with them full time next year. In Navan of the CCHL, he looked the part of a dominant offensive player. He escaped pressure consistently, pushed pace, and showed high end scoring upside with a plus shot. Playing at a higher level, such as the OHL and at the WJAC, Kingwell has been more of a support player. Get pucks in deep, work the forecheck, bring some tenacity. At either level, I think he has shown well as a boards player; he has quick feet that allow him to evade pressure and keep plays alive. He has a good skating base, but it’s obvious that he needs to get stronger to improve his speed and quickness. He can be knocked off stride too easily. For me, Kingwell’s upside is going to be tied to his scoring ability. The release on his wrister is lightning quick, so as he gets stronger and is able to get himself more chances at the higher levels, he could be a valuable complementary piece. The added strength will make him a more consistent physical threat too, a required element if he wants to take his game to another level. I'd just want to see more at a higher level first.

50. Michael Newlove - Goaltender - Windsor Spitfires
Newlove is a really fun goaltender to watch and a really cool story. Passed over in the OHL draft after playing for a poor Credit River team, Newlove then used an excellent U18 year with the Halton Hurricanes to help him get selected by Windsor (first overall) in the U18 draft. He is ultra athletic and a throwback to the Tim Thomas, Dominik Hasek, Jonathan Quick era with the way that he competes to make saves anyway he can. Yes, that means that technically he’ll have some things to work on as he moves up to higher levels, because he has a tendency to drop to the butterfly early and scramble to make saves. However, I think goaltending coaches at higher levels are going to love the physical tools here, especially when you consider that he’s not undersized like your typical hyper-athletic, scramble style netminder. Only played one full OHL game this year against Niagara and he was excellent in that game, making a few really high-end stops to secure the victory for Windsor. The key for Newlove will be finding a way to improve his rebound control. Gets to spots to make saves, but he can give up too many second chance opportunities. Additionally, he can sometimes give up soft goals that squeeze through his body, something that can be fixed. Lastly, something that separates Newlove from the pack is the way that he handles the puck. He scored a goal in the OJHL earlier this year and he’s ultra confident in playing the puck like a third defender. That’s a rare quality these days. If I’m an NHL organization, Newlove is the kind of goaltending prospect that I’m hoping other NHL teams aren’t on to, with the hope that I can grab him with a later pick. He possesses massive upside. It's just a matter of where he plays moving forward. Is he in Windsor's plans to backup Costanzo next year?